Optimisation problems connect derivatives to real choices – from fuel-efficient driving to designing containers.
Optimisation makes calculus tangible and powerful. Every day, we face questions like "What's the best way to do this?" or "How can I maximize that?" Calculus gives us the mathematical tools to answer these questions precisely.
Finding the greatest value:
Finding the smallest value:
At a maximum or minimum, the function momentarily stops changing — it's neither increasing nor decreasing. This is exactly where the derivative equals zero!
Think of climbing a mountain:
Key Mathematical Facts:
Common Misconception:
Not every point where is a maximum or minimum! You must verify using the second derivative test or sign changes. Some points might be points of inflection where the function doesn't actually change from increasing to decreasing (or vice versa).
Optimisation challenges pop up in every province. Use these story cards to anchor the maths in local, tangible decisions before diving into formal exercises.
Karoo & Northern Cape
KwaZulu-Natal coast
Limpopo cooperative
Pair every word problem with a visual: a labelled diagram plus a graph of the function we are optimising. These dynamic sketches match the way universities expect you to communicate reasoning.
Area vs length graph
Speed
80 km/h
Fuel
5.0 L/100 km
Derivative
0.00
Optimal
Model
f(v) = 3/80 v² - 6v + 245
Fuel use vs speed
Study these detailed examples to master the optimization process. Each example follows the 6-step roadmap.
We want to minimize fuel consumption . The domain is realistic speeds: , probably km/h.
Already in one variable:
Already done ✓ We're minimizing
Step 4a: Find the derivative
Step 4b: Set
Using the second derivative test:
Since , the function is concave up at , confirming a minimum.
Answer:
The most economical cruising speed is 80 km/h. At this speed, the car uses approximately litres per 100 km.
Why the second derivative test works:
If , the function curves upward like a smile 😊 → minimum
If , the function curves downward like a frown ☹️ → maximum
Let the two numbers be and .
Constraint:
Product to maximize:
From , we get
Substitute into the product:
Differentiate:
Set and solve:
Using the quadratic formula :
If , then , which gives . This is clearly not a maximum!
So we use , giving
At :
Since , we have a maximum ✓
Answer:
The numbers are and .
The maximum product is
WALL
length = l
(parallel to wall)
width = w
Fence: w + l + w = w + 2l (only 3 sides)
Goal: Maximize area
Constraint: Total fencing m
From :
Substitute into area formula:
Set :
Then m
The second derivative is always negative, confirming the function is concave down everywhere. Therefore, gives a maximum ✓
Answer:
Dimensions: Length m (parallel to wall), Width m
Maximum area: m²
Notice the pattern:
For a fixed perimeter, rectangles have maximum area when dimensions are in a 1:2 ratio. Here, 40:80 = 1:2!
Length along the wall (l)
Use w + 2l = 160 so w = 160 - 2l.
80 m
Only three sides are fenced.
3200 m²
100% = 3200 m²
0 (A'(l) = 160 - 4l)
optimal
Maximum area reached when and .
Area vs length graph
Apply what you've learned with these optimization problems. Start with basic questions and progress to more challenging ones.
Test your understanding of optimization concepts. Try to answer without looking back!
Link this optimisation lesson with differential rules, tangents, and rates of change to build a complete Grade 12 toolkit.